Br’er Canada and the Tar Baby

Disney animation of “Br’er Rabbit and the Tar Baby” from Songs of the South, a collection of Uncle Remus American folk tales.

On Nov. 6, 2015, President Obama canceled the Keystone XL pipeline. Canada PM Trudeau, just installed and wanting not to offend, politely said he was “disappointed.” Here is the back story that you won’t hear in the media.


Americans should know all about tar pits. As the traditional folk tale suggests, there have been many tar pools across the US. A famous one is in Los Angeles: La Brea Tar Pit. Pictured above around 1910, it’s an oil spill produced by Nature.  Notice the many oil derricks nearby.

Tar pits are composed of heavy oil fractions called gilsonite, which seeped from the Earth as oil. In Hancock Park, crude oil seeps up along the 6th Street Fault from the Salt Lake Oil Field, which underlies much of the Fairfax District north of the park.[3] The oil reaches the surface and forms pools at several locations in the park, becoming asphalt as the lighter fractions of the petroleum biodegrade or evaporate.

This seepage has been happening for tens of thousands of years. From time to time, the asphalt would form a deposit thick enough to trap animals, and the surface would be covered with layers of water, dust, or leaves. Animals would wander in, become trapped, and eventually die. Predators would enter to eat the trapped animals and also become stuck.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/La_Brea_Tar_Pits

La Brea Tar Pits and Museum today.

Canada’s Tar Baby

So, as you can see, tar pits are hazardous to animal and plant life. In Canada, we have a much greater problem bestowed on us: the Athabasca tar sands in Alberta. The oil deposits are much too large to put fences around it and open it as a museum, as was done in L.A. No, in Alberta the environmentally responsible thing is to clean up the mess Nature left behind.

The cleanup requires a massive effort, but costs can be offset by processing the tar into petroleum products and shipping them to markets who want to use them.  Using those products from syncrude oil liberates CO2 once trapped in bitumen, and in the air becomes available to plants who grow larger and faster from the increased concentration.  The Japanese would call this a “virtuous cycle.”

Br’er America is a neighbor with the facilities to help, but because of CO2 hysteria, the Obama administration is afraid of getting some tar on their hands. Actually a pipeline is the environmentally friendly way of transporting the crude oil, but now trains will be used instead of the pipeline.

The origin of the Alberta oil sands is a debated subject. Two primary theories are asserted:

1.) These sands are the remnants of a once vast reserve of crude oil that, over extremely long periods of time, has escaped or been destroyed microbiologically; thus leaving behind some bitumen and also converting the lighter crude oil into bitumen through bacterial processes.

2.) The bitumen evolved from highly organic cretaceous shales (similar to oil shale). Underground pressure forced the bitumen out of the kerogen rich shales where it soaked into existing silt grade sediments and sand bodies.

In the first theory, petroleum would be formed in the traditional manner, and then converted to bitumen by some additional process.  More description here.

Summary

So whether Nature created the tar mess by bacteria or by underground pressure, it’s up to us humans to clean it up. Canada is doing the heavy lifting, while the Obama administration prefers posing as an innocent bystander.

Advertisements

9 comments

  1. Pingback: Br’er Canada and the Tar Baby | NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT
  2. wolsten · November 9, 2015

    Reblogged this on Wolsten and commented:
    Obama blocks transport of oil produced from naturally occurring tar sands by pipeline. The only alternative is railroad tankers. Who is going to profit from this? Certainly not the environment.

    Like

    • jbenton2013 · November 9, 2015

      There’s one person who has already got his ducks lined up to profit from this. Warren Buffet. He predicted this outcome last year, and has already got the trains in place to handle the oil.

      Like

  3. botanyjrg · November 9, 2015

    My daddy used to read to me the stories from Joel Chandler Harris’ Br’er Rabbit. Make no mistake, Obama wishes to destroy the economy of the United States and the country itself. .

    Like

  4. craigm350 · November 9, 2015

    Reblogged this on WeatherAction News and commented:
    From Slate Feb 2013:

    The biggest winner from a halted Keystone XL will be the railroads. And of them, the biggest winner might just be the Burlington Northern Santa Fe, which is owned by Berkshire Hathaway, the conglomerate controlled by Obama supporter and Omaha billionaire Warren Buffett. In December, the CEO of BNSF, Matthew Rose, said that his railroad was shipping about 500,000 barrels of oil per day out of the Bakken Shale in North Dakota and that it was seeking a permit to send “crude by rail to the Pacific Northwest.” He also said the railroad expects to “eventually” be shipping 1 million barrels of oil per day.

    There’s no small bit of irony here. A century ago, populists on the left rose to prominence by condemning the moneyed interests, and in particular, the big banks and the railroads. The Populist Party Platform of 1892 said that “the people must own the railroads.” And yet now, in the name of reducing carbon dioxide emissions, the environmental left could hand the railroads a major windfall and get nothing in return but a symbolic victory.

    Condemning the oil industry, holding rallies, and getting arrested at the White House is easy. Preventing the world’s single most important commodity from getting to the marketplace? That’s a lot harder.

    http://www.slate.com/articles/health_and_science/science/2013/02/keystone_pipeline_protests_oil_companies_will_just_use_railroads.html

    Like

    • Jay · November 30, 2015

      I just found this site and think it will become a favorite. That said, I must object the castigation of Warren Buffet on the basis of oil transport being the principle reason for Berkshire Hathaway’s purchase of BNSF. While oil by rail is a good business, it forms only a small part of a large suite of transportation businesses that BNSF participates in. BNSF is a good investment because rail moves 20% of US freight and the future is bright and fairly dependable. Besides which, Warren’s buddy Obama isn’t exactly helping his friend by killing the coal industry aND the need to tran sport coal.

      Like

    • Jay · November 30, 2015

      I just found this site and think it will become a favorite. That said, I must object the castigation of Warren Buffet on the basis of oil transport being the principle reason for Berkshire Hathaway’s purchase of BNSF. While oil by rail is a good business, it forms only a small part of a large suite of transportation businesses that BNSF participates in. BNSF is a good investment because rail moves 20% of US freight and the future is bright and fairly dependable. Besides which, Warren’s buddy Obama isn’t exactly helping his friend by killing the coal industry and the need to transport coal.

      Like

  5. Pingback: Br’er Canada and the Tar Baby | ajmarciniak
  6. Craig Austin · November 12, 2015

    Canada does not have Tar Sands, it has oil sands, the difference is huge, oil is found in your engine, Tar is found in the asphalt driveway your car is parked on. Tar is largely a waste product, oil is a feedstock for modern life.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s