Update: Drama in Snowflake Academy


Snowflakes: Overly sensitive persons, incapable of dealing with any opinions differing from their own. Snowflakes are light-weight and suffer meltdown when exposed to the light or heat of complex ideas in conflict. They can often be seen congregating in “safe zones” on college campuses.

Professor Jordan Peterson is pushing back against embedded social justice warfare in the faculty offerings at University of Toronto.  He is starting a website that will inform students of the words and concepts that will be used in various classes, using the actual language on display.  This is deemed unsuitable and invading of safe spaces by those exposed.

Article is Faculty requests action against Peterson from a campus newspaper, The Medium.  Excerpts with my bolds.

Faculty members from the University of Toronto’s Women and Gender Studies Institute (WGSI) have requested a meeting with the university’s vice-provost to demand that action be taken against professor Jordan Peterson, who has stated his intent to create a website ranking university courses and instructors based on “postmodern neo-Marxian” ideologies included in course content.

“We are writing to express our deep concern about a proposed website being built under the direction of Prof. Jordan Peterson for the purpose of identifying and ranking courses and professors that he advocates should be removed from the university,” read the letter, “This website, if launched, presents a serious case of harassment, fostering unsafe work and study conditions for students, faculty, and staff.”

Peterson has spoken about this digital tool since summer of 2017, recently saying that he hopes to have the site ready by January.

“In public online remarks more broadly, Prof. Peterson regularly describes women and gender studies and what he refers to as ‘racial and ethnic group studies’ as pathological, a cancer, and in other strongly denigrating terms,” the letter also reads, “The launch of this website must be put in this context in order to fully understand it as a platform that will generate harassment.”

Peterson stated his goal to establish the website as a way of “moderating the behavior of the universities.”

“It will tell you the degree to which the description is postmodern and then you can decide for yourself whether you want to take that and become a social justice warrior, if that is what you think your education should be about, or if you should avoid that like the plague that it truly is,” Peterson stated in an interview with Julie Patreon, uploaded on July 3rd of this year, “I would like to knock enrolment in the postmodern disciplines down by 75 per cent over the next five years.”

“I think that what needs to happen is that freshman and second-year university students, and students coming into university from high school, need to be educated about the postmodern cult and they need to be encouraged to not take the courses, to just drop the courses, to just stay the hell away from them,” Peterson stated in a video uploaded on July 9th.

In the same video, Peterson expressed an interest in seeing enrolment in the humanities decline at an increased rate.

The university faculty also expressed concern over the “violence-tinged language to describe the courses he hopes to prevent people from taking” in Peterson’s videos.

On November 10th, the U of T Faculty Association released a statement stating that a meeting with the provost office has been requested.

“Instructors of the potentially targeted courses believe that their autonomy as educators may be under threat. The proposed website has created a climate of fear and intimidation,” the statement reads, “The UTFA Executive has taken the unprecedented step of asking that the entire Executive meet with the Provost’s office to express our deep concern about this threat to our members and to the academic mission of the University.”

As of press time, the provost has not released a statement regarding its intent to meet with faculty from WGSI regarding Peterson, or stated any possible plan to address Peterson’s site.

Peterson has frequently spoken out regarding freedom of speech on the university campuses, has voiced his dislike towards censoring lectures for students, and the current feminism movement.

Peterson has also gained national attention last September after refusing to use gender-neutral pronouns in his lectures. Since then, he has taken to uploading videos through YouTube to discuss his views on current social issues and doing guest speeches at public events.

Background is from previous post Inside the Snowflake Academy

A previous post (Retreat from Reason) provided a look into the mentality of today’s college professors teaching humanities and social sciences. The dominant mindset is termed “postmodern” to distinguish this perspective from the “modern” viewpoint born of the age of reason or enlightenment.

That text came from Professor Jordan Peterson who recommended reading a book by Stephen Hicks called Explaining Postmodernism. This post provides some descriptions (lightly edited) from Hicks regarding the education of today’s students and the liberal arts attitude toward science.

Hicks presents two hypotheses regarding the world-view embraced by postmoderns, which they pass on to their students.

Hypothesis 1: Postmodernism is the first ruthlessly consistent statement of the consequences of rejecting reason, those consequences being necessary given the study of knowledge since Kant.

Thomas Kuhn published in 1962 his landmark book, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, signifying the result of four decades of analytic philosophy and the dead end it had reached. If science’s tools are perception, logic, and language, then science, one of the Enlightenment’s prized children, is merely an evolving, socially objective enterprise with no more claim to objectivity than any other belief system. The idea that science speaks of reality or truth is an illusion. There is no Truth; there are only truths, and truths change.

Consequently, by the 1960s, the pro-objectivity, pro-science spirit had collapsed in the Anglo-American philosophical tradition.

Hypothesis 2: Postmodernism is the academic far Left’s stance in response to the crisis caused by the failures of socialism in theory and practice.

Postmodern thinkers inherit an intellectual tradition that has seen the defeat of all of its major hopes.

While the neo-Enlightenment thinkers have come to terms with the modern world, from the postmodern perspective the universe has been intellectually shattered. We can not turn to God or to nature, and we cannot trust reason or mankind.

The failure of Left politics to achieve the vision of a beautiful collectivist society was merely the last straw. To the postmodern mind, the cruel lessons of the modern world are that reality is inaccessible, that nothing can be known, that human potential is nothing, and that ethical and political ideals have come to nothing. The psychological response to the loss of everything is anger and despair.

But the postmodern thinkers also find themselves surrounded by an Enlightenment world that does not understand. Postmoderns confront a world dominated by liberalism and capitalism, by science and technology, by people who still believe in reality, in reason, and in the greatness of human potential. The world that they said was impossible and destructive has both come to be and is flourishing. The heirs of the Enlightenment are running the world, and they have marginalized the post-modernists to the academy. Resentment is then added on top of anger and despair.

The Enlightenment world is proud, confident, and knows it is the wave of the future. This is unbearable to someone invested totally in an opposed and failed outlook. That pride is what such a person wants to destroy. The best target to attack is the Enlightenment’s sense of its own moral worth. Attack it as sexist and racist, intolerantly dogmatic, and cruelly exploitative. Undermine its confidence in its reason, its science and technology. The words do not even have to be true or consistent to do the necessary damage.

The College as Snowflake Academy

In education, postmodernism rejects the notion that the purpose of education is primarily to train a child’s cognitive capacity for reason in order to produce an adult capable of functioning independently in the world. That view of education is replaced with the view that education is to take an essentially indeterminate being and give it social identity. Education’s method of molding is linguistic, and so the language to be used is that which will create a human being sensitive to its racial, sexual, and class identity.

Our current social context, however, is characterized by oppression that benefits whites, males, and the rich at the expense of everyone else. That oppression in turn leads to an educational system that reflects only or primarily the interests of those in positions of power. To counteract that bias, educational practice must be recast totally. Postmodern education should emphasize works not in the canon; it should focus on the achievements of non-whites, females, and the poor; it should highlight the historical crimes of whites, males, and the rich; and it should teach students that science’s method has no better claim to yielding truth than any other method and, accordingly, that students should be equally receptive to alternative ways of knowing.

Moderns thought science and technology are good for all, extending our knowledge of the universe and making the world healthier, cleaner, and more productive. Postmoderns say science betrays its elitism, sexism and destructiveness by making the speed of light the fastest phenomenon, thereby unfairly privileging it over other speeds–by having chosen the phallic symbol i to represent the square root of negative one–by asserting its desire to “conquer” nature and “penetrate” her secrets–and, having done so, by having its technology consummate the rape by building bigger and longer missiles to blow things up.

And previously it had been generally thought liberalism, free markets, technology, and cosmopolitanism are social achievements that can be enjoyed by all cultures. On the contrary, Postmoderns think non-Western cultures are superior, since they live simply and in harmony with nature. They find the West is arrogantly blind, elitist and imperialistic, and imposes its capitalism, its science and technology, and its ideology upon other cultures and an increasingly fragile ecosystem.


And thus graduates are fully equipped and predetermined to believe in climate change.





  1. Geoff Chambers · November 14, 2017

    I’m as disturbed and irritated as you and Professor Peterson are by post modernism, but I can’t agree with the analysis you give.

    In stating that “his goal to establish the website as a way of moderating the behavior of the universities,” isn’t Professor Peterson merely mirroring the attempts at thought control of which he accuses his opponents?
    Likewise, Hicks’ thinking seems pretty confused, from the quotes you give. What does It mean to say that “the consequences of rejecting reason, [are] necessary given the study of knowledge since Kant”? And is Thomas Kuhn really responsible for modern science denial? Surely he was merely pointing out the failures of scientific practice to conform to its ideal as a search for truth?

    His second hypothesis is equally questionable. Of course there are some people for whom it is true that “Postmodernism is the academic far Left’s stance in response to the crisis caused by the failures of socialism in theory and practice.” Reading Marx is hard, and political organising is even harder. So it’s not surprising that some people prefer to chant slogans and pull down statues. But the current direction taken by triumphant capitalism hardly looks sustainable, so I wouldn’t write off socialism yet.

    I suggest that ridicule, as in the excellent illustration to your article, might be a better approach than Professor Jacobson’s attempts to bludgeon students into defiance. Or pointing out the personal advantages in getting a proper education, learning stuff that demands an intellectual effort, like maths, science and foreign languages.


    • Ron Clutz · November 14, 2017

      Geoff, some fair points, but a bit over the top. “Bludgeon”? He is going to provide a website so students can realize the POV that will be advocated should they sign up, using course content as information for making choices.


      • Ron Clutz · November 14, 2017

        Peterson said this about the website idea:

        “It’s tricky because of the amplifying effect of social media, and because the effects of social media are not exactly predictable,” he said. “I’ve had qualms about whether or not to do this, which is why I haven’t done it. … I’ve been sitting on it trying to feel my way through it to determine where the proper ethical line lies because I think it’s wrong to increase polarization, because it’s dangerous. But I also think it’s wrong to inflict upon students, who don’t know any better, corrupt ideology.”

        Liked by 2 people

    • Dmh · November 14, 2017

      This discussion or critique of post-modernism is at the center of the present political debate and it’s very important in the sense that it also concerns a serious crisis in the modern human society.
      The problem is that it is essentially philosophical and should go beyond politics, otherwise this debate will produce no significant answers to the crisis.
      Politics has turned good ideas into jokes, including concern about Nature and social injustice, and the justification and realization of science as a social effort.

      The idea that
      “Moderns thought science and technology are good for all, extending our knowledge of the universe and making the world healthier, cleaner, and more productive.”
      is non satisfactory if it refers to a restricted class of people in society instead of the entire humanity. Knowledge and a healthy life should be essential rights given to every person in the world and politics is always about privileges.

      One evident fact that reveals this contradiction, in the recent evolution of science and technology, is the existence of wars and poverty in a world where only the global military expenses could easily feed one third of humanity.
      The interference of politics (and capitalism) on science (and technology) is obviously deleterious in the case of global warming fiasco, but also in other branches of science like high energy physics, astrophysics, the research in “clean energy”, in medicine, etc.
      The discussion about trans-gender people is in principle a very important subject – and one of the central parts of Prof. Peterson ideas – but it would never become such a hot topic – as it’s now in the political debate – if it was not for the large financial interests behind the “transition” procedure, which has become a flourishing industry in the last few years.

      Our present society is having a multifaceted crisis originated in the increasing interference of politics, and the capitalist interests behind it, on central aspects of life like knowledge and human rights.
      Feminism, as in the 2nd wave of the 1960’s and 70’s, which is being called radical feminism now, is a breath of fresh air in this discussion and it’s not only women who think in this way.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Ron Clutz · November 14, 2017

        Dmh, thanks for a thoughtful comment. It is a crisis in western philosophy, and thus in our social spirituality. There are distinct echoes of McLuhan’s warnings about the global village being an arena for tribal conflicts. You are also right about politics amplifying rather than resolving these issues, along with the media of course, who are today aligned with vested interests. IMO we are seeing currently the reduction of politics down to personal rather than the public good, and more specifically to sexual behavior as the determining qualification.

        Liked by 1 person

    • rw · November 21, 2017

      I’d say we’re a little too far along for your suggestions to be of much use – in fact, I find them evasive in a way that I don’t think is true of Peterson’s remarks.There is a real crisis here, and a kind of madness has been let loose, so that the Western world is beginning to resemble a gigantic Salem Village. What we may be seeing is how the human mind carries on when it’s not properly moored to the world. (And of course it will all eventually come crashing down. The real world has a way of doing that; just ask the Venezuelans.)

      Liked by 1 person

      • Ron Clutz · November 21, 2017

        “When men choose not to believe in God, they do not thereafter believe in nothing, they then become capable of believing in anything.”

        ― G.K. Chesterton

        Liked by 2 people

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s